Then comes the website. The fit states the offenders signed up “cretintownsend.com” on October 28, 2025, lifting the complainant’s trade name word for word. The filing declares the lookalike site mimicked C-T Homes closely and, according to the complainant, appeared as the third listing in search engine result.
The how is what need to make home builders and agents sit up. According to the filing, the phony website provided a contact kind that “iteratively extracts important customer information” – names, e-mails, task details – and sent out every entry to a site the accuseds controlled. An automated e-mail then nudged those visitors towards the offenders’ own business, the fit states, with follow-up messages to close the loop. C-T House says neither it nor the customers knew the leads were being harvested.
The stakes, in the plaintiff’s informing, were not little. The suit states each diverted query could represent a construction agreement “worth in excess of $300,000.00.” Worse, it says, consumers who got no reply assumed Cretin Townsend Residences had just disregarded them – a hit to the contractor’s track record.
The filing also flags how the website vanished. It says that shortly after an unapproved interaction with the accuseds, the website went dark – timing the plaintiff argues “highly recommends” an effort to “hide its misbehavior and damage all proof.” That reading comes from the complainant. The accuseds have actually not reacted to it.
One information on the second defendant. Andries Home loan is called in the event, however the claim accuses it of no specific act beyond supplying, “on info and belief,” home mortgage and lending services to Andries Builders’ consumers in the very same market. The conduct at the center of the match is the contractor’s.